JudgeBob

Idea Man

Comments

[this is good]

"The vast majority (around 81%) of Americans believe that American workers have a right to have a secret ballot election before they are forced to join a union."

No kidding! Years ago I was pissed that we HAD to join a union to work at Disneyland. Making around $8 bucks an hour and then having to pay the worthless union $30 a month - FOR NOTHING! Wow - I guess I am still a tad mad about that ;)

I have only once been a member of a union. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters local 381. They did help raise my income upon starting the job, ($12/hr) however, they were worthless after that. Worse than worthless, they eliminated my ability to negotiate raises, to insist on certain cooperation between me and management, and fight for my worker's rights. We were reduced to a union of 4 members by the time the company closed its doors. Now why did the company have to close its doors? Was it the union forcing them to pay the workers a living wage? Nope, the managers were ripping to COOPERATIVE off to the tune of $15,000 to $50,000 per month. This came out in bankruptcy court after the fact. And where was the union for the four years I was there? Couldn't care less. Never again.
[這個好]
Excellent nine ideas here from Newt Gingrich. But probably too sensible for the US Government.
[this is good]
Remind Americans that judges matter. Senate Republicans should mount an ongoing fight (including a filibuster of other activities if necessary) to get the American people to realize that liberals want to block all current judicial appointments in order to maximize the number of left wing radical judges they can appoint if they win the White House. This issue has three advantages. It reminds people that judges matter and that a leftwing radical Supreme Court would be bad for the values of most (70 to 90 percent, depending on the issue) Americans. It shows the Democrats are not engaged in fair play. It arouses the activism of those who have been disappointed by Republicans and have forgotten how bad a liberal Democratic Presidency would be.

This is a must do - but so are 7 others.

Point taken. I've heard today that the Republican party is dying due to the loss of the younger generation. God help us. The ideas die because of the media, educational institutions, and blogs, bias' Obama wins on a vacuous platform because we want a black man in office. I want a black man in office, but I want one that isn't going to get us killed. Almost as important is Supreme Court justices. Nothing will change unless the base are moved back to their traditional values. The base is still well above 80% moderate conservatives but aren't serious about their values. 7 years is apparently long enough to forget what dangers lurk out there and in fact, right here.
Uh, why is it important to have constructionist judges again? Our national memories are far too short.
1. The twisting of the constitution to claim it says the complete opposite of what it says.

a. freedom of religion - has been twisted freedom from religion
b. the right to life, liberty... - has been twisted to kill your baby
c. right to bare arms - twisted to not good

etc. This could go on and on, what we've have 40 to 50 years of the liberal justices twisting the constitution into a socialist free for all.
You are very right, JudgeBob. There is too much surface pandering and little substance, and that charge can be levelled at both Democratic front-runners. The loss of values, more than anything else, has led much of the western world down its present path. I wish I could claim some smug superiority living in New Zealand but I cannot—we are just as bad. I even think seven years is too optimistic. I have an awful feeling that the base’s collective memory is shorter, which is why as a society we keep taking two steps forward, one step back—and that’s on a good day.
Representatives are beating their heads against the wall trying to get people to look past the evening news' soundbites and really consider what is being debated and who stands where and why. As a former nominal voter, I understand how impossible that is. Nominal voters look at Washington and sees crooks, perverts, and power mongers on every side of the equation. They're not too far from the truth. But that creates a disinterest in the process that results in more crooks, perverts, and power mongers winning office. Once they take the process seriously and get past the rhetoric to who stands where and why, the vast majority will vote in integritous, honorable men and women. More and more Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are running for office. When they become a force to be reckoned with, then we'll see some corrections like Newt presents, but I don't think they will be the ones who will correct the values judges on things like publicly funded abortion and gay marriage, gay privilege.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement